Skip to main content

Fairshare International: a fair share for everyone - global community; global responsibility


FAIRSHARE INTERNATIONAL
Who? What? Why?

FairShare International is a diverse, global community of individuals, families and businesses who are taking a stand for a fair share for everyone, always. We are against the unjust distribution and misuse of the world's resources - money, water, energy and minerals. We are for a fair go for all people.

Of the earth's water, energy and minerals used each day, 80% is consumed by 20% of the earth's wealthy population (about a billion of us), leaving almost nothing for the majority of people and compromising the existence of future generations. This consumption is neither fair nor sustainable. By joining the FairShare community, you can help to:

• decrease the gap between rich and poor

• better use the earth's resources

• be more ethical in connections with others

• conserve the natural environment and threatened species

How does 5.10.5.10 work?

The FairShare community uses the formula of 5.10.5.10 to put four goals to work each and every day. These goals attempt to suggest new standards for living ethically in the affluent world. By living 5.10.5.10 each day, you refuse to be a bystander and you elect to take actions that matter by:

5 - Redistributing your personal wealth by giving away at least 5% of your gross annual income to any number of programs that provide direct assistance to financially disadvantaged individuals, families and communities anywhere on earth, and/or for the care of the natural environment, including conservation of the earth's resources.
10 - Reducing your use of water, energy and minerals by at least 10%, based on the national average per capita consumption, and sustaining reduced consumption forever.
5 - Building community through contributing at least 5% of your leisure time annually in direct, face to face assistance to people who could use your help or with others in your neighbourhood who are tackling social or environmental challenges.
10 - Taking significant democratic action at least ten times a year to correct practices associated with greed and injustice that hurt people and the environment. (Letters to politicians, corporations and the media are a highly effective way to initiate dialogue and ultimately, positive social change.)

Friends of FairShare commit to giving directly, at their own discretion and according to their individual passions. The 'FairShare Portfolio' is a concept and tool at the heart of FSI. An example of a 'balanced' FairShare portfolio might include one overseas aid organisation, one education sponsorship in Australia and one in an overseas country, one share of wilderness or natural heritage, one threatened animal or plant, and one human rights effort. It might also include direct gifts to people who you know are really struggling. And it could, of course, include a gala fundraising dinner or two. So each FairShare portfolio is different - reflecting the interests and passions of its owner.

What Fairshare International is NOT !
It is not about donating to charities and other funds, but it is about redistributing wealth.

While many FSI Friends give to philanthropic organisations, the idea of the first goal encompasses much more than that. It's about making a difference to financially disadvantaged people in Australia or anywhere on earth, and about taking a stand to reduce the gap between rich and poor. This doesn't necessarily have to happen through an intermediary. For example, a person might find a way to assist their local activist who spends half their time planting trees for life. Or they might give direct aid to a financially disadvantaged family they met on their travels. And so forth.

The intention of the first goal, then, is the redistribution of wealth: let there be a redistribution of wealth and let it begin with my money. If enough people said this, and then did it, there would be a huge positive impact in the world. Contributing to funds that support research into health in the First World is great, and FSI applauds this, but we do not construe this as contributing to the first goal: too many people in the Majority World are denied absolutely the opportunity of ever suffering from most of the affluent world's health problems. When FSI thinks 'health', we think about clean water, not a triple bypass.

FSI also focuses on the inevitable disadvantage in store for future generations if there is continued depletion of the environment. That's why the first goal encompasses not only the redistribution of monetary wealth but also the preservation of natural wealth. Many FSI Friends will support environmental organisations and indeed some may feel strongly enough to allocate all of their financial commitment to conservation.

It is not about self sacrifice but it is about self expression

People who are financially disadvantaged may very well wish to give time, money and talents to help others - doing these things has always been the impulse of what the Dalai Lama calls 'good human beings'. However, FSI discourages 'redistributing wealth' if it means sacrificing a decent standard of your own living.

Instead, FSI envisions Friends who recognise that they have too much money and too much 'stuff' and so give away some of it thus creating a space for self expression. For example, someone might take up bussing or cycling to work to finance their gifts. Another might swear off new clothes, experimenting to see how long it takes for their clothes to wear out. Someone else might return to mending rather than throwing things out at the first sign of wear and tear. Developing their skills in vegetarian cooking might be someone else's goal, or taking their lunch rather than always buying it. And so on.

Apollo astronaut, Russell Schweiker, said: 'We're not passengers on Spaceship Earth, we're the crew. We're not just residents on this planet, we're its citizens. The difference in both cases is responsibility.'

Fairshare International at http://www.fairshareinternational.org/



 

 

MARTINA NICOLLS

MartinaNicollsWebsite

 

Martinasblogs

Publications

Facebook

Paris Website

Animal Website

Flower Website

SUBSCRIBE TO MARTINA NICOLLS FOR NEWS AND UPDATES 


MARTINA NICOLLS  is an international human rights-based consultant in education, healing and wellbeing, peace and stabilization, foreign aid audits and evaluations, and the author  of: The Paris Residences of James Joyce  (2020), Similar But Different in the Animal Kingdom (2017), The Shortness of Life: A Mongolian Lament (2015), Liberia’s Deadest Ends (2012), Bardot’s Comet (2011), Kashmir on a Knife-Edge (2010) and The Sudan Curse (2009).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pir-E-Kamil - The Perfect Mentor by Umera Ahmed: book review

The Perfect Mentor pbuh  (2011) is set in Lahore and Islamabad in Pakistan. The novel commences with Imama Mubeen in medical university. She wants to be an eye specialist. Her parents have arranged for her to marry her first cousin Asjad. Salar Sikander, her neighbour, is 18 years old with an IQ of 150+ and a photographic memory. He has long hair tied in a ponytail. He imbibes alcohol, treats women disrespectfully and is generally a “weird chap” and a rude, belligerent teenager. In the past three years he has tried to commit suicide three times. He tries again. Imama and her brother, Waseem, answer the servant’s call to help Salar. They stop the bleeding from his wrist and save his life. Imama and Asjad have been engaged for three years, because she wants to finish her studies first. Imama is really delaying her marriage to Asjad because she loves Jalal Ansar. She proposes to him and he says yes. But he knows his parents won’t agree, nor will Imama’s parents. That

Flaws in the Glass, a self-portrait by Patrick White: book review

The manuscript, Flaws in the Glass (1981), is Patrick Victor Martindale White’s autobiography. White, born in 1912 in England, migrated to Sydney, Australia, when he was six months old. For three years, at the age of 20, he studied French and German literature at King’s College at the University of Cambridge in England. Throughout his life, he published 12 novels. In 1957 he won the inaugural Miles Franklin Literary Award for Voss, published in 1956. In 1961, Riders in the Chariot became a best-seller, winning the Miles Franklin Literary Award. In 1973, he was the first Australian author to be awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature for The Eye of the Storm, despite many critics describing his works as ‘un-Australian’ and himself as ‘Australia’s most unreadable novelist.’ In 1979, The Twyborn Affair was short-listed for the Booker Prize, but he withdrew it from the competition to give younger writers the opportunity to win the award. His autobiography, Flaws in the Glass

Sister cities discussed: Canberra and Islamabad

Two months ago, in March 2015, Australia and Pakistan agreed to explore ways to deepen ties. The relationship between Australia and Pakistan has been strong for decades, and the two countries continue to keep dialogues open. The annual bilateral discussions were held in Australia in March to continue engagements on a wide range of matters of mutual interest. The Pakistan delegation discussed points of interest will include sports, agriculture, economic growth, trade, border protection, business, and education. The possible twinning of the cities of Canberra, the capital of Australia, and Islamabad, the capital of Pakistan, were also on the agenda (i.e. called twin towns or sister cities). Sister City relationships are twinning arrangements that build friendships as well as government, business, culture, and community linkages. Canberra currently has international Sister City relationships with Beijing in China and Nara in Japan. One example of existing