Skip to main content

Maps: digital mapping may be making our world smaller and people less adventurous




Before maps, people only knew their own neighborhood, says New Scientist (19 January, 2013). However, digital maps that are accessible on smartphones are customizing our needs which is transforming and influencing our world. One of the first efforts to digitalize maps was in 2001 when the UK’s Ordnance Survey published virtual versions of their paper products, entering the mainstream after Google listed businesses with small maps to locate them. Now there is a competitive rush to produce digital maps. And while the ocean remains mostly digitally uncharted, companies are now exploring that frontier to feature shipwrecks, shipping lanes, and other features.


As New Scientist says, the most coveted territory is closer to home: the indoors. Navigation aids are being developed so that people can find items in their own home or in a public building, such as a store or library or museum. Floor plans are being listed for airports, hospitals, train stations, and universities, to name a few places.


Information on local neighborhoods is very popular – such as restaurants, cafes, stores, traffic lights, and even crime statistics. Real time information such as weather, pollution, and traffic congestions are constantly being overlaid onto neighborhood maps. Kat Austen, in the New Scientist article, writes “gaining such an enhanced awareness of our surroundings could influence our decisions as we navigate through the world.” She says information such as crime statistics, house prices, restaurant reviews, travel reviews and local demographics may influence where we choose to visit or even live. And she adds that “it could discourage investment where it is needed” – such as in socially and financially disadvantaged areas. 
Another downside is that maybe people trust the maps too much. There have been many instances of people using virtual maps but getting lost – sometimes very lost, or dangerously lost (such as in outback Australia).


The problem with digital maps is “that it is difficult to know how they have been curated – and who, what and where is left out.” Additionally, the interests of businesses may not always align with the interests of individuals. However, due to the competitive market, there are efforts to make digital maps more transparent and accurate. Some allow people to edit information.


What is not yet clear is how the digital maps influence the mind and our perception of the world. They “may affect our ability to build maps in our minds.” Georg Gartner, a cartographer at the Vienna University of Technology in Austria, and president of the International Cartographic Association, argues that reading maps on cellphones can affect our spatial cognition. Small screens mean that we view less of a map’s context in a single view. In an experiment, Gartner found that people who used a series of smaller maps to navigate through a city found it harder to orient themselves in relation to landmarks compared with people who used a larger map with more visible context. People using a cellphone map also struggled to describe an accurate picture of their route.


Similarly, Toru Ishikawa at the University of Tokyo in Japan, who compared navigational skills of digital and paper map users on unfamiliar streets, found that those referring to their smartphones travelled more slowly, walked longer distances, and were worse at working out their orientation than those using a paper map. This is because, when using a paper map, we have to make an effort to interpret our location. If we don’t use these mental skills, our minds are in danger of becoming less able to retain maps in our head, says Ishikawa. Gartner says, “a map on a mobile device or in a navigation system leads to less accurate mental maps and a lower ability to act in the real world.”


Hence, Kat Austen says that digital maps on smartphones could make us “duller, less questioning and more unadventurous.”


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The acacia thorn trees of Kenya

There are nearly 800 species of acacia trees in the world, and most don’t have thorns. The famous "whistling thorn tree" and the Umbrella Thorn tree of Kenya are species of acacia that do have thorns, or spines. Giraffes and other herbivores normally eat thorny acacia foliage, but leave the whistling thorn alone. Usually spines are no deterrent to giraffes. Their long tongues are adapted to strip the leaves from the branches despite the thorns. The thorny acacia like dry and hot conditions. The thorns typically occur in pairs and are 5-8 centimetres (2-3 inches) long. Spines can be straight or curved depending on the species. MARTINA NICOLLS is an international aid and development consultant, and the author of:- Similar But Different in the Animal Kingdom (2017), The Shortness of Life: A Mongolian Lament (2015), Liberia’s Deadest Ends (2012), Bardot’s Comet (2011), Kashmir on a Knife-Edge (2010) and The Suda...

Hop on hop off bus tourism comes to Tbilisi, Georgia

City Sightseeing buses have arrived in Tbilisi. The iconic red double-decker buses, a feature of many cities around the world since the company was established in Seville, Spain in 1999, is now in six continents and almost 100 cities. The company established its Tbilisi business in November 2013, with its operations commencing in February 2014. The 90-minute tour stops at 11 major locations in Tbilisi (with 2 to 5 minute waiting times at each location): the Old City (where it commences), Freedom Square, Rose Revolution Square, Marjanishvili Square, the Dry Bridge, Konka, Avlabari, Metekhi, Akhundov Museum, the Sulfur Baths, and European Square. Passengers can hop off at any stop and see the sights, hopping back onto the next bus at any time. Alternatively, passengers can remain on the bus for the whole tour and take photographs when the bus stops at each location. There are one day (24-hour) passes (for 35 lari – about $20) and 48-hour passes for 55 lari, with family d...

The Knight in the Panther Skin by Shota Rustaveli (2015 translation): book review

The Knight in the Panther Skin (12th century, this edition 2015) is a recent translation by American poet and author, Lyn Coffin. The author, Shota Rustaveli, is Georgia’s most loved poet. This poem is mammoth, a magnum opus – it is 1,656 verses long, separated by chapters. But readers, don’t give up, because every verse is worth reading. It is akin to 1001 Arabian Knights, Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales, or Shakespearean poetry. King Rostevan of Arabia has a daughter, Tinatin. She loves the knight Avtandil and he loves her. Verse 368 from Avtandil: ‘The doctor’s could do nothing. A dark twilight on my heart now pressed, I was on fire because of love, but nobody knew or guessed. They blamed my blood. The king decided bleeding my arm would be best; I let it be done to hide the suffering I had not confessed.’ But a knight in panther skin is seen weeping, and subsequently kills the king’s soldiers, sparing the king. Before Tinatin weds Avtandil she r...