The controversy regarding the koala’s status as threatened
or thriving continues as the Australian government’s national Threatened
Species Scientific Committee announced its ruling on April 30.
The federal environment minister, on advice from
the Threatened Species Scientific Committee, announced that Australia’s most “at
risk” koala populations in Queensland, New South Wales, and the Australian
Capital Territory (ACT-Canberra) will be listed as vulnerable under national
environment protection laws (Canberra Times, May 1, 2012). However, koala
populations in Victoria and South Australia will be excluded from the listing
because they are deemed to be thriving—either stable or increasing in numbers.
The Premier of Queensland, Campbell Newman, has
opposed the listing because the implications mean restrictions to housing
developments and mining, thus resulting in job losses in the construction industry.
Conservation groups, such as Humane Society
International, Friends of the Earth, and the Australian Koala Foundation, are
not happy with the listing either. They want a blanket cover for all koala
populations across the all regions in order to protect the iconic and
much-loved symbol of Australia. Victorian and South Australian koala populations
should also be listed as vulnerable because they are genetically different to
other populations, they maintain. Because these koala populations occur in the
regions due to tanslocations (sourced from other populations in other regions),
they are said to have low genetic diversity. Conservation groups want
protection for koala habitats, research related to koala diseases, and action
to deal with threats to koala populations (such as dog attacks, land
degradation, and road accidents).
The controversial issue is related to numbers.
All koala statistics are non-existent in some regions, and out-dated or estimated
in other regions. As mentioned in my blog “Koala numbers uncertain: high in
some areas of Australia, a threatened species in other areas” (April 26, 2012),
a 1993 survey of koala populations in Gunnedah Shire (northwest of Sydney, in New
South Wales) estimated 15,000 koalas and that “recent numbers” were now between
500 and 2,000. In the Shire, these numbers are not currently certain. The Australian Koala Foundation, through its
Koala Habitat Atlas, believes that the national wild koala population could be
less than 80,000 and dwindling due to habitat loss. However, many scientists in
Australia do not support AKF’s estimates regarding the numbers of koalas in the
wild, nor their reasons for the decline in some areas. The Australian government currently estimates the
koala population in the “hundreds of thousands” countrywide and lists it as a
priority species for conservation status assessment.
Countries often take a count of threatened or endangered species of
animals. For example, in October 2009, the Ministry of the Environment and
Tourism in Mongolia undertook a census (count) of wild mountain sheep, wild
goats, black tailed gazelle, antelope, and wild horses. The last count of
reindeer was at the end of the 1980s conducted by the National University of
Mongolia and the University of Irkutsk in Russia. Students counted 400 reindeer
at the time. Apparently, no-one has seen them in the wild since.
A national koala census may be required to more accurately determine
regional koala populations, their decline or otherwise, and habitat threats or otherwise.
The Threatened Species Scientific Committee continually monitors the
populations of native species, defines precise boundaries between zones where
koala numbers are stable or in decline, and evaluates their classification and
listing accordingly. However, current koala numbers remain unknown and
uncertain.
Comments
Post a Comment