Frida’s Bed (2007, English translation 2008) is an innovative work with an intelligently conceived approach to the narration of Mexican artist Frida Kahlo’s life and death.
It
does not begin at the beginning, for it is only 162 pages. It begins with her deterioration
and dying, in her bed at her parent’s La Casa Azuli, The Blue House, in Mexico
City. With flashbacks, the reader pieces together her agonizing life – where
“life, not death, still posed the greater challenge” – and how her chronic
lifelong pain – both a hindrance and an enhancement – influenced her art.
From
polio at the age of 6, to the horrific bus accident at 15 (leaving her impaled
and shattered), to the amputation of her toes, and finally the amputation of
her leg at 46, a year before her death, Kahlo’s salvation was her art, and her
painkillers.
The
innovative style of Croatian-born Drakulic is not the fluid and simple, yet
evocative and poignant writing – it is the way the information is revealed in
three methods. It is undoubtedly fiction, and part historical narrative (third
person), part fictional autobiography/memoir (first person narrative by Kahlo),
and part art critique.
The
third method – art critique – is easily discernible through the use of italics.
However, the first two methods – narrative and autobiography – are so
intertwined that paragraphs often combine the two techniques simultaneously.
For example – “Last year when my leg was amputated it was
my-what?-thirty-second operation? Frida tried to remember exactly, touching the
scars on her back, her tummy, her leg. I can’t remember them all. I wonder if abortions
count as operations.” Readers may find the style disconcerting at first, but I
found that it enabled an understanding of the connection between agony and
creativity.
The
entirety of the novel is a chronicle of pain – its birth, its treatment, its
physicality, its psychology, and its artistic manifestation. Its persistency
and the pleasure of relief – albeit temporary – are constant themes. “Pain made
me aware of my body. My body made me aware of deterioration and death. That
awareness made me old.” Kahlo is depicted as old before her time – her ageing
appearance, the loss of her teeth, and her toes, and her leg, and the odour of
gangrene and rotting flesh - “a painful body, an unwanted body.”
But
it is also about the pain of a volatile marriage. She married Mexico’s most
famous painter, the muralist Diego Rivera (1886-1957), who suffocated Kahlo’s
visibility as a surrealist and magic realism artist in her own right. Born
Magdalena Carmen Frieda Kahlo y Calderon (1910-1954), she married Diego “The
Maestro” in 1929 when he was 42 and she was 22. They divorced in 1939 and
re-married in 1940, but he was a notorious womanizer – and she knew it. In her
early years with Diego she changed her style of clothing for him – trading
mannish suits for folkish peasant dresses – which eventually defined her
appearance. Her father had died long ago, and The Maestro was more a
father-figure than a husband. She moved out of the marital home, and lived out
her life at her parent’s Blue House, when he had an affair with her sister,
Kity. Double betrayal added salt to her existing wounds.
“She
still yearned for him. He continued to fill her world – whether from fear of
abandonment and poverty, or because she sought an impossible love, it no longer
mattered … she had become even more aware of what an obstacle the body posed –
her own and other women’s …” Juxtaposed with this scene is a critique of Kahlo’s
painting The Love Embrace of the Universe in which her husband is depicted as a
baby in her arms. She is the protector, not him. “That makes her feel safe: he
will never leave her … It fills her heart to cradle him, the way it would, she
thinks, if she had a child.”
Of
her 140 plus paintings, 55 were self-portraits. Her body and her emotions were
what she knew well. Kahlo gained recognition post-humously in the 1980s during
the Neomexicanismo movement. “White, not black, was the color of her death.”
She died at the age of 47.
Drakulic’s
novel contains brief critiques of various Kahlo paintings: Girl with Death Mask
I, The Dream, Frida and Diego Rivera, My Dress Hangs There, Self-Portrait with
a Doll, A Few Small Nips, Self-Portrait with Cropped Hair, What Water Gave Me,
My Birth, The Broken Column, Self-Portrait dedicated to Leon Trotsky – Between
the Curtain, Tree of Hope, Roots, Girl with Death Mask II, The Frame, and
Self-Portrait with Dr Farill. It’ll make you view Kahlo paintings in a new
light – while looking constantly for her portraits wearing the earrings Picasso
gave her.
Every
page is beautifully crafted, intriguing, insightful, and uncomfortable, throbbing
with tenderness and stinging with pain. And in the end, it is not the pain impaled in your skin like an embedded steel rod that is remembered, but the
loneliness – the lifetime of loneliness and endurance – that lingers.
Self Portrait dedicated to Leon Trotsky - Between the Curtain (Photograph taken during my visit to the National Museum of Women in the Arts, Washington DC, 2013)
MARTINA NICOLLS is an international
aid and development consultant, and the author of:- The Shortness of
Life: A Mongolian Lament (2015), Liberia’s Deadest Ends (2012), Bardot’s Comet
(2011), Kashmir on a Knife-Edge (2010) and The Sudan Curse (2009).
|
Comments
Post a Comment