Skip to main content

Planet Pluto's demotion and promotion: does size really matter?

Photo: coulartsandleisure.blogspot
Many moons ago – in January 2006 to be precise – NASA sent a probe, called New Horizons, on a ten-year mission to search for the edge of our solar system. It went very close to planet Pluto, our solar system’s smallest planet.

On August 24, 2006, planet Pluto was stripped of its title. Pluto was demoted from planet status to dwarf planet status. The demotion was a blow to Pluto. There was much debate on its demotion with many scientists seeking its promotion to its original status. Size isn’t everything, they said. A Chihuahua is still a dog, they said. They said that it was obvious that objects of this size, thousands of miles in diameter, were planets. They argued that it had a crust and a core (the attributes of planets) and atmospheres and moons (the attributes of planets) and seasons too (also the attribute of a planet). Full planethood was assured, they said. But no, it remains to this day a demoted planet.

Nine years (and 3 billion miles) later, the New Horizons probe is getting close to Pluto again – on the outer edge of our solar system. And, in the next few months, people on Earth will see photographs of pretty Pluto. New Horizons was estimated to reach Pluto in July 2015, but we may see photographs sooner than that. New Horizons will be the first spacecraft to photograph Pluto with the aim of learning more about it – how it evolved, what its moons are like, and what type of geology it has.
To keep New Horizons going, scientists powered down a lot of onboard systems – they basically turned it off. Now that it is getting close to its target, all systems are up and running again, in readiness to take the photographs. What if, when the whole of planet Earth sees the photographs of Pluto, scientists have second thoughts about their 2006 decision? Could Pluto be on its way to a promotion?

Here’s a reminder of why Pluto was demoted in the first place. The International Astronomical Union (IAU) voted to demote it. American astronomer Clyde W. Tombaugh first discovered Pluto in 1930 from the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona. He had observed it for about a year – with its 5 moons – before he finally declared that he had found planet X (which scientists had predicted might be in our solar system). Tombaugh and his team called it Pluto. In 1978 scientists worked out its mass and size (2,400 kms or 1,500 miles across). It was a bit smaller than planet Mercury (4,880 kms or 3,032 miles across).

The problem was that in a place in space called the Kuiper Belt (where Pluto is), astronomers were finding other large objects with the same composition as Pluto. So some scientists said that Pluto was “just another Kuiper Belt object.” And then in 2005 an astronomer found an object about the same size as Pluto (called UB313 first before it was called Eris). Eris is about 2,600 kms or 1,600 miles across with 25% more mass than Pluto. What were astronomers going to classify Eris as – a planet or a just a Kuiper Belt object? At the 2006 IAU conference scientists debated the definition of a planet. Some said both Pluto and Eris were planets (and maybe so was the large asteroid Ceres). IAU concluded that a planet was defined as: (1) an object in orbit around the Sun; (2) having sufficient gravity to hold its spherical shape; and (3) having “cleared the neighbourhood” of its orbit. Big objects in space push away smaller objects in its own orbit. For example, Earth has 1.7 million times the mass of other objects in its own orbit and therefore can push them away. But Pluo is only 0.7 times the mass of other objects in its orbit and therefore is not very strong. The final vote was that Pluto did not meet the third requirement. So it came down to strength, not size!

The New Horizon spacecraft will not only take photographs of Pluto, but it may also determine any difference in its size or strength (to fulfil the third requirement). Will Pluto’s demotion become a promotion? Well, it will it terms of promoting the beautiful photographs and Pluto’s public relations campaign, but will it be enough to promote Pluto to full planet status?

That’s why it will be exciting to see the planetary photographs. We wait with great anticipation. I’m on the side of a promotion!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pir-E-Kamil - The Perfect Mentor by Umera Ahmed: book review

The Perfect Mentor pbuh  (2011) is set in Lahore and Islamabad in Pakistan. The novel commences with Imama Mubeen in medical university. She wants to be an eye specialist. Her parents have arranged for her to marry her first cousin Asjad. Salar Sikander, her neighbour, is 18 years old with an IQ of 150+ and a photographic memory. He has long hair tied in a ponytail. He imbibes alcohol, treats women disrespectfully and is generally a “weird chap” and a rude, belligerent teenager. In the past three years he has tried to commit suicide three times. He tries again. Imama and her brother, Waseem, answer the servant’s call to help Salar. They stop the bleeding from his wrist and save his life. Imama and Asjad have been engaged for three years, because she wants to finish her studies first. Imama is really delaying her marriage to Asjad because she loves Jalal Ansar. She proposes to him and he says yes. But he knows his parents won’t agree, nor will Imama’s parents. That

Flaws in the Glass, a self-portrait by Patrick White: book review

The manuscript, Flaws in the Glass (1981), is Patrick Victor Martindale White’s autobiography. White, born in 1912 in England, migrated to Sydney, Australia, when he was six months old. For three years, at the age of 20, he studied French and German literature at King’s College at the University of Cambridge in England. Throughout his life, he published 12 novels. In 1957 he won the inaugural Miles Franklin Literary Award for Voss, published in 1956. In 1961, Riders in the Chariot became a best-seller, winning the Miles Franklin Literary Award. In 1973, he was the first Australian author to be awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature for The Eye of the Storm, despite many critics describing his works as ‘un-Australian’ and himself as ‘Australia’s most unreadable novelist.’ In 1979, The Twyborn Affair was short-listed for the Booker Prize, but he withdrew it from the competition to give younger writers the opportunity to win the award. His autobiography, Flaws in the Glass

Sister cities discussed: Canberra and Islamabad

Two months ago, in March 2015, Australia and Pakistan agreed to explore ways to deepen ties. The relationship between Australia and Pakistan has been strong for decades, and the two countries continue to keep dialogues open. The annual bilateral discussions were held in Australia in March to continue engagements on a wide range of matters of mutual interest. The Pakistan delegation discussed points of interest will include sports, agriculture, economic growth, trade, border protection, business, and education. The possible twinning of the cities of Canberra, the capital of Australia, and Islamabad, the capital of Pakistan, were also on the agenda (i.e. called twin towns or sister cities). Sister City relationships are twinning arrangements that build friendships as well as government, business, culture, and community linkages. Canberra currently has international Sister City relationships with Beijing in China and Nara in Japan. One example of existing