Family
businesses are passed down from generation to generation – but the dilemma is when to pass on the responsibility and
control.
The
firm PwC studied 200 next generation family members in 21 countries expecting
to take over the family business in a publication called Bridging the Gap: Handing over the Family Business to the Next
Generation (The Financial,
finchannel, April 21, 2014). The issues examined included: how family firms are
planning the handover, how the next generation views the handover, and the
challenges faced by family businesses in implementing the handover – the succession.
From
the study, two “gaps” became apparent: (1) the credibility gap; and (2) the
communication gap. The credibility gap is the transition from a trusted name to
the maintenance of the reputation during the handover, while the communication
gap is the crack or chasm that can open between parents and children in talking
about succession. PwC looked at the effect of global changes, such as
demographic shifts as family members travel, study, and live elsewhere; the world
“becoming smaller” in which businesses are trying to go global while retaining
a sense of local traditions; urbanisation; climate change and the pressure to
“go green” and environmentally friendly; and the ever-changing communication
technologies.
The
study revealed that there were more concerns when it was the “first generation”
handover of a family business. Families that had already handed down generation
after generation had been through a number of challenges and were less
concerned about problems that might arise for the firm’s continuation. The
children of first generation handover families were less enthusiastic about the
prospect – 20% said they were not looking forward to running the family
business.
Of
the next generation, 89% said they wanted to “do something significant and
special” with the family business when they take over – to give it their own
stamp – and 80% said that they had big ideas for the firm for change and
growth. Some wanted to launch new products or ventures, or make changes to
where and how the business was run. Others wanted to invest in new technologies
and explore new approaches, especially with regard to social media, said the
PwC report.
Some
of the next generation (14%) have studied for a business degree in preparation
for the handover, and 34% have taken training courses in succession management.
They want to implement more rigorous processes, especially related to finances
and budgeting. They want clearer roles and responsibilities and have these
documented and disseminated. And they want to upgrade their IT systems to
introduce digital technology.
For
credibility, 88% of the next generation said that the family name might be a
disadvantage rather than an advantage, and said that they would have to work
harder than their parents to “prove themselves.” And 59% said that gaining the
respect of their co-workers would be their single biggest challenge.
Promotion
to CEO was not expected to be automatically handed down from one generation to
the next. The report revealed that of the 73% that said they were looking
forward to taking over the business, only 35% thought it was a definite or
foregone conclusion, and 29% thought it only “fairly likely.” Therefore some
were looking for experience outside the family firm. Only 7% had gone straight
into the family business from school (as their parents or grandparents
typically did), and 31% went to university first, while 46% had worked for
another company before taking a role in the family business.
With
regard to the generation that were already running the business and looking to
hand it over, the report revealed that there was a tendency for many to
overestimate how well they operated the business. In addition, they
underestimated how well their children could take over – their capacity and
capabilities.
Current
family business members thought their children were not sufficiently
entrepreneurial and were not prepared to put in the long hours needed to build
a successful business.
The
phenomenon of the current generation underestimating what the next generation
could do, and the next generation overestimating what they want to do, is
called the “sticky baton” by the PwC report. This could lead to the firm being
handed over to the current generation “in principle and in theory” but still with
the parents maintaining control, which might cause frustration with the
“impulsive and impatient” next generation family members.
The
survey revealed that 87% of the next generation think that their parents have
confidence in their abilities and 91% would value their parents’ continued
input. However, 64% think the parents would find it tough to let go control of
their business.
The
report concluded that the firms that manage succession well are those that plan
many years ahead – ideally 5-7 years in advance – and include “sensible
conversations that address roles, responsibilities, and timings.”
Comments
Post a Comment