Skip to main content

Does speed reading work?



A team of psychologists examines whether speed reading actually works – whether reading at an increased speed leads to a loss in understanding or not (Association for Psychological Science, January 19, 2016).

Speed reading was introduced in 1959 as a way to train readers to take in more information more quickly without sacrificing accuracy and understanding. Speed readers take in more visual information at a single glance and suppress the inner speech that often occurs when reading silently word-for-word. With the increase in digital text, another method has become popular – rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). The claim is that, free from the need for eye movement, people can read more quickly than usual.

In the 1980s researchers studied speed reading by comparing the comprehension levels among three groups: (1) speed readers, (2) people who read at a normal speed, and (3) people who were told to skim the text. Results showed that speed readers understood the text better than skimmers, but not as well as normal-paced readers.

The normal pace of most readers is 200-400 words per minute. Skimming is about 600-700 words per minute. The World Championship Speed Reading Competition tests speed and comprehension, and the top contestants read about 1,000-4,000 words per minute with about 50% comprehension or above, although there are speed readers who can read up to 10,000 words per minute.

This recent study addresses the question whether there is a unique form of reading in which speed and comprehension are both high. They also sought to determine whether people can achieve speed and comprehension with little or no practice by using special technologies. The team from the University of California in San Diego, the University of Victoria, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Washington University in St. Louis will publish their results in the Psychological Science in the Public Interest journal in May 2016.

Reading is based on language, so it is not a purely visual process. However the premise behind speed reading is that it is possible to use peripheral vision to simultaneously read large segments of a page, perhaps even a whole page, instead of one word at a time.

Researchers first studied eye movement. Normal English-language readers span the distance of 7 letters, and about 30% of the time readers move past, or sweep to, the next word to the following word, especially if the word is short – but the word is still processed. About 10% to 15% of the time, the researchers note, skilled readers make regressions, moving back to the previous word, especially if the word is long.

Researchers also studied word identification and perception. In this part of the study the researchers found that the perceptual span of readers is limited – readers cannot obtain information from a very large area of the visual field, but instead they process text in the centre of their vision. This is contrary to the claim of speed readers.

Then researchers addressed the context of speed reading technologies to gain more textual information – i.e whether people need to move their eyes to read and understand. They found that people do need to move their eyes to place them over the region that they want to process in order to process the information more efficiently.

Reading speeds of speed readers varies considerably. They found that reading speed is  tied to language-processing abilities rather than the ability to control eye movement. Therefore they also looked at how people recognize words, the role of speaking in your head during silent reading, and what happens when a word had more than one meaning.

Lastly they studied comprehension and understanding – of individual words and sentences, but also total understanding of the information, and the new speed reading technologies.

The results showed that ‘there is no such magic bullet.’ There is a trade-off between speed and accuracy in reading. Increasing the speed with which a reader encounters words has consequences for how well the words are understood and remembered. In some reading, speed is the goal, rather than comprehension. They also found that skimming is an important skill.  The researchers state that ‘in many other situations, however, it will be necessary to slow down to a normal pace in order to achieve good comprehension.’ Moreover, they say that readers need to re-read parts of the text to ensure better understanding.

In conclusion, the researchers state that the way to maintain high comprehension and read text faster is to practice reading and to become more skilled at language (e.g through increased vocabulary). ‘This is because,’ they say, ‘language skill is at the heart of reading speed.’



MARTINA NICOLLS is the author of:- The Shortness of Life: A Mongolian Lament (2015), Liberia’s Deadest Ends (2012), Bardot’s Comet (2011), Kashmir on a Knife-Edge (2010) and The Sudan Curse (2009).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pir-E-Kamil - The Perfect Mentor by Umera Ahmed: book review

The Perfect Mentor pbuh  (2011) is set in Lahore and Islamabad in Pakistan. The novel commences with Imama Mubeen in medical university. She wants to be an eye specialist. Her parents have arranged for her to marry her first cousin Asjad. Salar Sikander, her neighbour, is 18 years old with an IQ of 150+ and a photographic memory. He has long hair tied in a ponytail. He imbibes alcohol, treats women disrespectfully and is generally a “weird chap” and a rude, belligerent teenager. In the past three years he has tried to commit suicide three times. He tries again. Imama and her brother, Waseem, answer the servant’s call to help Salar. They stop the bleeding from his wrist and save his life. Imama and Asjad have been engaged for three years, because she wants to finish her studies first. Imama is really delaying her marriage to Asjad because she loves Jalal Ansar. She proposes to him and he says yes. But he knows his parents won’t agree, nor will Imama’s parents. That

Flaws in the Glass, a self-portrait by Patrick White: book review

The manuscript, Flaws in the Glass (1981), is Patrick Victor Martindale White’s autobiography. White, born in 1912 in England, migrated to Sydney, Australia, when he was six months old. For three years, at the age of 20, he studied French and German literature at King’s College at the University of Cambridge in England. Throughout his life, he published 12 novels. In 1957 he won the inaugural Miles Franklin Literary Award for Voss, published in 1956. In 1961, Riders in the Chariot became a best-seller, winning the Miles Franklin Literary Award. In 1973, he was the first Australian author to be awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature for The Eye of the Storm, despite many critics describing his works as ‘un-Australian’ and himself as ‘Australia’s most unreadable novelist.’ In 1979, The Twyborn Affair was short-listed for the Booker Prize, but he withdrew it from the competition to give younger writers the opportunity to win the award. His autobiography, Flaws in the Glass

Sister cities discussed: Canberra and Islamabad

Two months ago, in March 2015, Australia and Pakistan agreed to explore ways to deepen ties. The relationship between Australia and Pakistan has been strong for decades, and the two countries continue to keep dialogues open. The annual bilateral discussions were held in Australia in March to continue engagements on a wide range of matters of mutual interest. The Pakistan delegation discussed points of interest will include sports, agriculture, economic growth, trade, border protection, business, and education. The possible twinning of the cities of Canberra, the capital of Australia, and Islamabad, the capital of Pakistan, were also on the agenda (i.e. called twin towns or sister cities). Sister City relationships are twinning arrangements that build friendships as well as government, business, culture, and community linkages. Canberra currently has international Sister City relationships with Beijing in China and Nara in Japan. One example of existing