Eastward to Tartary:
Travels in the Balkans, the Middle East, and the Caucasus (2000) is a
documentary-style travelogue in three parts. The first section is The Balkans,
Part II is Turkey and Greater Syria, and Part III is The Caucasus and Tartary.
Kaplan commences his
travels in 1998 from Budapest, Hungary, with his first stop in Debrecen, until
he reaches his most eastern destination, Merv, in Turkmenistan in 1999. In
between, he visits Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Israel,
Georgia, and Azerbaijan. After his last stop, Kaplan returns to America and
‘shortly thereafter’ in October 1999 he flies to Armenia (which he covers in
the Epilogue).
He writes of each
countries’ history from ancient feuds to contemporary politics, their wealth
and poverty, their religion, their lifestyle from food to alchohol, and their
ideologies. He writes of ‘old-new’ nations and of irredentism – the political
movement to reclaim and reoccupy a lost homeland – and of blood loyalties. He
focuses on everything from the military, economy, culture, agriculture,
architecture, geography (from flatlands to mountains), lifestyle, and politics,
to passions.
I was mostly
interested in the chapters on Ajara and Georgia, and also of neighboring
Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Turkmenistan – the Caucasus Region. Of Georgia, Kaplan
writes, ‘Few places, with the possible exception of Romania, were to move me as
deeply as Georgia. But like Romania, Georgia was an acquired taste.’
The Epilogue on
Armenia is also interesting: from the capital Yerevan – also mentioning Ararat
(in Turkey) – to Stepanakert in the autonomous region of Nagorno-Karabakh.
The name of the book
is not quite accurate. First, Kaplan travels west, and only eastward when he is
in the Caucasus. Second, Tartary incorporates the areas of the Volga-Urals,
Caucasus, Siberia, Turkmenistan, Mongolia, and Manchuria – but in this book’s
context it is only Turkmenistan.
On a personal level, Kaplan
concludes that everywhere ‘the human spirit seemed to me indomitable.’ While he
comments on people he meets, it is less about the citizens and more about the
history and politics. He answers questions, but also poses his own questions –
usually global political questions about the regions.
Kaplan travelled with
his notebook and sought out high-level government officials to interview, as
well as a few general citizens. Hence instead of an informal travelogue, the documentary-style
writing is dense, political, and speculative (about what might happen in these
regions in the future). However, considering he travelled in 1998-1999, it is interesting to read his ‘journalistic’ view.
Comments
Post a Comment