Skip to main content

Dialogue in prose - making it sound natural



A discussion on dialogue in prose reveals that most writers prefer to make it sound as natural as possible, as if the reader were listening to a real conversation. Some writers, such as Henry James, wrote ‘like he talked, in long, involved sentences with a little murmer-mum-mum-mum standing for parenthesis, and with all these rhetorical hooks he seemed to be poking about in his mind, fumbling through the whole basket of his conversational vocabulary, to find the exact next word’ (The Chronicle of Higher Education, September 4, 2015). Good writing should be similar to speech, is the usual advice to authors, but researchers are exploring the difference between written conversations and the real thing.

Language researchers recognise that ‘pure speech doesn’t work on the page.’ This is because pure speech stops and starts, goes around in circles, contains ums and uhs, and generally waffles and backtracks – and contain poor grammar because people rarely edit their own speech. Pure speech also contains diction and rhythm – the rise and fall of speech, the surprise, the anger, the emotions, the musings and the ramblings.

Recent research published in the June 2015 issue of Psychological Science on ‘The Sound of Intellect’ reports the results of an experiment on persuasive language conducted by the University of Chicago in America. Researchers, Juliana Schroeder and Nicholas Epley, involved MBA candidates (Master of Business Administration) and asked them to prepare two brief presentations for prospective employers (as if they were trying to get a job) – one was a written text and the other was an audio recording. Another random group of participants were asked to judge the presentations on three criteria: intellect, the likelihood that the speaker will be hired by the prospective employer, and general impressions.

The results showed that, on all three criteria, the audio presentations were judged to be significantly more effective in enabling the candidate to get ‘the job.’ The reason was that the features of a speech, such as variance in pitch, reveal ‘an active and lively mind’ and can convey ‘enthusiasm, interest, and active deliberation.’ In the written text, these attributes were more difficult to distinguish.

The written texts revealed that the candidates ‘did not predict that they needed to overcome these limitations and did not do so spontaneously.’ In other words, the written text was not tailored to compensate for the lack of real speech mannerisms. Their written words did not sound like a person’s natural speech, which requires a great deal of technical skill and more conscious thinking. Which is why it is tough for writers to write dialogue and conversational speech. It takes effort.



http://chronicle.com/blogs/linguafranca/
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pir-E-Kamil - The Perfect Mentor by Umera Ahmed: book review

The Perfect Mentor pbuh  (2011) is set in Lahore and Islamabad in Pakistan. The novel commences with Imama Mubeen in medical university. She wants to be an eye specialist. Her parents have arranged for her to marry her first cousin Asjad. Salar Sikander, her neighbour, is 18 years old with an IQ of 150+ and a photographic memory. He has long hair tied in a ponytail. He imbibes alcohol, treats women disrespectfully and is generally a “weird chap” and a rude, belligerent teenager. In the past three years he has tried to commit suicide three times. He tries again. Imama and her brother, Waseem, answer the servant’s call to help Salar. They stop the bleeding from his wrist and save his life. Imama and Asjad have been engaged for three years, because she wants to finish her studies first. Imama is really delaying her marriage to Asjad because she loves Jalal Ansar. She proposes to him and he says yes. But he knows his parents won’t agree, nor will Imama’s parents. ...
1 comment
Read more

The acacia thorn trees of Kenya

There are nearly 800 species of acacia trees in the world, and most don’t have thorns. The famous "whistling thorn tree" and the Umbrella Thorn tree of Kenya are species of acacia that do have thorns, or spines. Giraffes and other herbivores normally eat thorny acacia foliage, but leave the whistling thorn alone. Usually spines are no deterrent to giraffes. Their long tongues are adapted to strip the leaves from the branches despite the thorns. The thorny acacia like dry and hot conditions. The thorns typically occur in pairs and are 5-8 centimetres (2-3 inches) long. Spines can be straight or curved depending on the species. MARTINA NICOLLS is an international aid and development consultant, and the author of:- Similar But Different in the Animal Kingdom (2017), The Shortness of Life: A Mongolian Lament (2015), Liberia’s Deadest Ends (2012), Bardot’s Comet (2011), Kashmir on a Knife-Edge (2010) and The Suda...
1 comment
Read more

Shindi: the Georgian Cornelian cherry

The Cornelian cherry – shindi in Georgian – is a fruit with medicinal and decorative properties. It was grown from ancient times, according to the International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS). It is also commonly called the European cornel. It is native to southern Europe from France to Ukraine as well as Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iran, Turkey, Israel, Lebanon, and Syria. The Cornelian cherry tree ( Cornus mas ) can be grown in orchards, but it is often seen in the forests of Georgia where it grows up to 1,350 metres above sea level. It is a medium to large deciduous tree, growing from 5-12 metres tall. The flowers are small with four yellow petals in clusters, which flower in February and March. The Cornus mas has three botanical varieties: (1) var. typica Sanadze with cylindrical red fruits, (2) var. pyriformis Sanadze with pear-shaped red fruits, and (3) var. flava vest with yellow fruits. The fruits are oblong red drupes about 2 centimetres ...
Post a Comment
Read more