Skip to main content

Flat-pack and fighting: why assembling furniture makes couples fight

dreamstime.com

Comedy artist Amy Poehler joked that Ikea, the company that sells do-it-yourself furniture, was Swedish for ‘argument’ because assembling furniture makes couples fight. Flat-pack furniture is touted as cheap and chic – and easy to assemble – but it is also the start of contentious arguments (Quartz, September 18, 2015).

Behavioural psychologists and family therapists maintain that assembling flat-pack furniture releases emotional triggers that commence long before anyone picks up a screwdriver. They document five argumentative phases: (1) showroom shopping, (2) unboxing, (3) reading instructions, (4) the construction, and (5) the fighting.

Shopping for the flat-pack furniture is said to be an ‘emotionally destabilizing experience’ and a ‘relationship nightmare.’ The showroom is where the potential for arguments begin (although some say the catalogue phase can be the onset). In the showroom there are choices to be made regarding the design of the furniture. If couples can’t decide on the design – then they tend to extrapolate that they may be incompatible in all other areas of life and living.

A pivotal moment in flat-pack assembly is the unboxing. One person usually leads the unboxing and laying out the pieces of furniture. However, there can be arguments about who is best to logically set out the pieces and ‘manage the production.’ This is the initial power struggle. Who is in charge? What if the assistant sees that the process is not going well? Does he or she step in and point this out to the leader? No one really likes constructive feedback.

Reading instructions is the frustrating phase. Instructions are usually lots of pictures with little or no text, aimed for everybody, no matter what language they speak. The assembly instructions sound like the construction phase should be easy – with minimal time and effort. Anxiety rises. Self-abuse kicks in, says author of Reptiles in Love: Ending Destructive Fights and Evolving Toward More Loving Relationships, Don Ferguson.

A 2014 study at Monmouth University and Ursinus College in America divided participants into two groups. One group was given a simple, stress-free task of writing down numbers chronologically. The second group was given a complicated set of mathematical problems. After the task both groups were asked to write down compliments they might give their partner at home (whom were not present during the experiment). The stressed out group had 15% fewer nice compliments to say about their loved ones than the non-stressed group. Even though the partners had nothing to do with the experiment. So what hope do couples have when assemling a flat-pack!

Psychologists say that the construction phase of flat-pack furniture assembly can be a killer – in theory. The blame game sets in when the furniture has only three legs and falls over. Dan Ariely at Dukes University in America, and part of the Harvard Business School team that coined the terminology ‘the Ikea effect’ in 2011, says ‘people love a thing more if they participate in some small way in its creation.’ But during furniture assembly ‘things happen in an unexpected way. There are pieces missing. People put things together in the wrong way.’ Who do we attribute the problem to – the instructions or the person reading them? Of course, there are always people who begin assembly without reading the instructions. Feelings of inadequacy rise. Up goes the anxiety levels.

The fighting phase tends to go beyond the construction of the furniture – and ends up with arguments about the parents-in-law, the children, the office, the lack of holidays, and so on. It’s no longer even about the furniture. And the ‘fight or flight’ response ensues. The couple either argues or one person storms off in a huff. By this stage there is acute anxiety and stress. Maturity, patience, and reason are temporarily switched off. Dan Ferguson says, ‘the higher brain shuts down. The primitive brain takes over. And there’s no organization or reason there.’

The Quartz article documents steps in handling the conflict. Step one is to assign responsibility, not blame, before the box is opened. Have a conversation about what will be the end-product and who will take the lead. The leader should communicate instructions clearly, while the assistant should avoid criticizing the leader. Step two is to take a break – have a walk around the garden or have a coffee break – ‘press the pause button’ occassionally – and have a sense of humour. Step three is stop, don’t continue, call a friend, or an expert in furniture assembly!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pir-E-Kamil - The Perfect Mentor by Umera Ahmed: book review

The Perfect Mentor pbuh  (2011) is set in Lahore and Islamabad in Pakistan. The novel commences with Imama Mubeen in medical university. She wants to be an eye specialist. Her parents have arranged for her to marry her first cousin Asjad. Salar Sikander, her neighbour, is 18 years old with an IQ of 150+ and a photographic memory. He has long hair tied in a ponytail. He imbibes alcohol, treats women disrespectfully and is generally a “weird chap” and a rude, belligerent teenager. In the past three years he has tried to commit suicide three times. He tries again. Imama and her brother, Waseem, answer the servant’s call to help Salar. They stop the bleeding from his wrist and save his life. Imama and Asjad have been engaged for three years, because she wants to finish her studies first. Imama is really delaying her marriage to Asjad because she loves Jalal Ansar. She proposes to him and he says yes. But he knows his parents won’t agree, nor will Imama’s parents. That

Flaws in the Glass, a self-portrait by Patrick White: book review

The manuscript, Flaws in the Glass (1981), is Patrick Victor Martindale White’s autobiography. White, born in 1912 in England, migrated to Sydney, Australia, when he was six months old. For three years, at the age of 20, he studied French and German literature at King’s College at the University of Cambridge in England. Throughout his life, he published 12 novels. In 1957 he won the inaugural Miles Franklin Literary Award for Voss, published in 1956. In 1961, Riders in the Chariot became a best-seller, winning the Miles Franklin Literary Award. In 1973, he was the first Australian author to be awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature for The Eye of the Storm, despite many critics describing his works as ‘un-Australian’ and himself as ‘Australia’s most unreadable novelist.’ In 1979, The Twyborn Affair was short-listed for the Booker Prize, but he withdrew it from the competition to give younger writers the opportunity to win the award. His autobiography, Flaws in the Glass

Sister cities discussed: Canberra and Islamabad

Two months ago, in March 2015, Australia and Pakistan agreed to explore ways to deepen ties. The relationship between Australia and Pakistan has been strong for decades, and the two countries continue to keep dialogues open. The annual bilateral discussions were held in Australia in March to continue engagements on a wide range of matters of mutual interest. The Pakistan delegation discussed points of interest will include sports, agriculture, economic growth, trade, border protection, business, and education. The possible twinning of the cities of Canberra, the capital of Australia, and Islamabad, the capital of Pakistan, were also on the agenda (i.e. called twin towns or sister cities). Sister City relationships are twinning arrangements that build friendships as well as government, business, culture, and community linkages. Canberra currently has international Sister City relationships with Beijing in China and Nara in Japan. One example of existing