The OECD – the
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development – conducted a global
study on the use of computers in classrooms and the result was quite
surprising. Computers don’t improve student results, and could actually be more
likely to be associated with lower examination results (BBC.com, September 15,
2015).
The OECD study
examined the impact of technology on international test results (such as PISA –
the Program for International Student Assessment) in more than 70 countries.
The study measured digital skills and test results in reading, mathematics, and
science.
The results showed
that in countries where education systems invested heavily in computers, and
information and communications technology, there was ‘no noticeable
improvement’ in PISA test scores for reading, mathematics, or science. Students
who used tablets and computers on a regular basis often tended to do worse on
tests than students who used computers moderately (once or twice a week).
Students who used computers moderately did ‘somewhat better’ at test results
than students who rarely used computers.
South Korea and
Shanghai in China showed high student test scores, but they have lower levels
of computer use in schools. Singapore schooling has a moderate use of computers and topped the
school test results in digital skills. There was ‘no single country in which
the internet is used frequently at school by a majority of students and where
students’ performance improved.’ Among the seven countries with the highest
level of internet use in school, the OECD study found three countries
experienced ‘significant declines’ in students’ reading performances –
Australia, New Zealand, and Sweden. Another three of the seven countries had ‘stagnated’
in terms of students’ reading performances – Spain, Norway, and Denmark.
Computers in schools
were touted as the approach to narrow the socio-economic gap between the poor
and wealthy in terms of education and learning. However the OECD study shows
that technology does not narrow the socio-economic gap – it might even amplify
it.
Why? The lower school
results could be related to raising too many false hopes – pinning high results
on the use of technology. Classroom technology could be a distraction. And
often the computerised programs had ‘prefabricated’ homework answers. Actually the OECD study did not examine why - that's the next step in analysing the results.
However the use of
computers in schools ‘can’t be turned back’ but school and education officials should
determine how technology can complement the foundations of good teaching,
quality curricula, and a focus on assisting students achieve their full
potential.
Comments
Post a Comment