The Economist published an article on August 12, 2015,
with the headline: 'The jobs market – Silver linings.’ What does ‘silver
linings’ mean?
Urban Dictionary
defines ‘silver lining’ as a phrase ‘used to tell someone that there is a
brighter side to the problem they are facing.’ The saying ‘Every cloud has a
silver lining’ means that with every problem or difficulty there may also be
the potential for a good or beneficial outcome. The song, ‘Always look on the
bright side of life’ in the Monty Python film Life of Brian is a classic example of looking for the silver lining
in the dark cloud.
Hence, does the
headline of The Economist article
lead readers to some potential good news about the job market? To see silver
linings readers need to see some potential good news.
The article commences
with ‘between 2008 and 2014, the number of Britons in work rose by 2m.’ That
sounds promising. But the next sentence is ‘But average weekly earnings fell by
8% in real terms, in spite of a rise in working hours.’ That does not sound
promising – no silver lining in that sentence. The article calls this dilemma
‘the productivity puzzle’ in which there is a strong economic recovery, but
output per worker per hour has fallen.
The article states
that ‘there was better news on the wages front … Britons are now getting a pay
rise. Wages rose by 2.4% year-on-year in the second quarter.’ It adds that ‘in
other areas, too, the jobs market is returning to its pre-recession norm.’ It
seems like there is still some bad news, because the article mentions that
‘over the past year the number of full-timers has risen faster than employment
overall, while the number of part-timers and freelancers has fallen.’ That’s
good news for full-timers, but not so good news for people wanting part-time
work. I still can’t see where the silver linings are in real terms.
‘Economists are mainly
upbeat about these trends, which suggest that the period of low productivity
and low wages may be coming to an end’ says the article. Why? Because ‘they see
the period of falling productivity and real wages after the recession as an
aberration.’ But the article continues with more good news and more bad news,
‘Immigration from crisis-struck Europe and welfare cuts have increased
Britain’s labour supply, keeping wages down and encouraging employers to hire
more workers and invest less in machinery and other forms of capital. But with
unemployment now nearing its post-2000 average again, labour shortages are
pushing up wages, cooling hiring.’ The article’s concluding remark is ‘And with
real earnings still 5.7% below their peak in 2008, the recovery still has much further
to go.’ So where are these silver linings mentioned in the headline? They seem
a little off-white to me.
The scorecard for The Economist headline is 60% - the
article gives examples of a slight improvement in the job market only to give a
negative statement in the next sentence. Employment overall is up, pay is down,
working hours are up, a pay rise in forthcoming and the number of full-timers
is up, but part-timers are down, freelances are down, productivity is down,
immigration is up, labour supply is up, wages are still down, investment in
machinery is down, recruitment is down, and we still have a way to go before
the economic recovery is stable. Silver linings – not really. This is more like
a rollercoaster. Up and down and up and down. A better headline would be: ‘The
jobs market – Rollercoasting.’
http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2015/08/jobs-market
Comments
Post a Comment