The Story of Edgar Sawtelle (2008) is set in mid-west America, west of Mellon, at Chequamegon National
Forest in northern Wisconsin, in the 1940-50s. It is the story of Edgar
Sawtelle, a 14-year-old mute boy, living on his parent’s farm, where they breed
dogs. Edgar can hear, but he can’t speak.
It commences briefly
in South Korea in 1952, which at first glance seems confusing, but 90% into the
book this location becomes clear. The main story commences as an epic
generational tale in 1919 with Edgar’s grandfather John, a dairy farmer, who
established the dog breeding farm. John and his wife raised two boys: Gar and
Claude. Gar stayed on the land, while Claude left.
Gar marries Trudy, and
they have one son: Edgar. Trudy trains the dogs and teaches Edgar sign
language. The family’s affinity with the dogs is extraordinary, but it also
fires their desire to create a new breed. One noted breeder comments that this
is ‘common vanity, one that every breeder has indulged during a weak moment.’
But the family persist with their goal.
Gar dies during a
storm. His father’s death haunts Edgar: ‘If I could have made a sound.’ He
knows the future of the farm depends on him, despite his immense grief. But
then Claude returns to the family farm after 20 years away and begins
infiltrating himself into the business and into Trudy’s life, to the distress
and rising resentment of Edgar. Edgar, always ‘so inward and stoic’ becomes
increasingly more uncommunicative.
The vet’s accident on
the Sawtelle farm is the turning point in the novel. Edgar feels responsible
for his fall and flees into the Chequamegon National Forest with three dogs. The
vet’s son, Glen, meets Claude at his father’s funeral where Claude plants the
seeds of revenge. Glen takes the bait and tries to find Edgar. The ending may
not please some readers.
The novel has been
touted as ‘the extraordinary debut novel that became a modern classic’ with a
Shakespearean ending – following the plot in Hamlet exceptionally closely. The
novel has a gripping psychological plot – the classic mother-son, uncle-defacto
jealousy as well as the jealousy between the two brothers, Gar and Claude. It
also has the insidious infiltration and deceptions of Claude the prodigal
returnee, the parallel development of the mute dogs and mute son, and the
remoteness of the wilderness, all making this an intriguing story. But there
are also a host of confusions and loose threads that often makes this a
frustrating read with more questions than answers. It seems to be one of
those ‘love it or hate it’ novels that raises the ire of readers due to
the ending – which diverges radically from the rest of the Hamletic plot.
Comments
Post a Comment